Close

Articles Posted in Legal Malpractice Issues

Updated:

Cheney v. Flood, NO. 13-P-259: Massachusetts Appellate Court Affirms Dismissal of Legal Malpractice Action Against Administrator of Estate

The Massachusetts Appeals Court, which is located in Boston, has affirmed the dismissal of a legal malpractice action and summary judgment of a related quantum meruit claim. A woman provided care to her stepfather during the last years of his life. She had hoped that she and her children would…

Updated:

DeFranco v. Judy, Nos. 2012-G-3114, 2013-G-3135: Ohio Appellate Court Affirms Summary Judgment in Legal Malpractice Action

In Massachusetts, professional negligence claims against an attorney must be filed within three years (M.G.L. c. 260 § 4). Fraud claims also have a three year statute of limitations (M.G.L. c. 260 § 2A). However, these periods do not begin to run until a client’s discovery of the actionable conduct.…

Updated:

Nye v. Eastman & Smith, LTD, C.A. NO. L-13-1034, Court of Appeals of Ohio Affirms Dismissal of Legal Malpractice Action Due to Lack of Standing

In all jurisdictions, including Massachusetts, a plaintiff cannot maintain a malpractice claim against an attorney unless an attorney-client relationship exists. Spinner v. Nutt, 417 Mass. 549 (1994). Lawyers hired to advise trustees of trusts owe a duty of care to beneficiaries and other third parties only in rare circumstances. Id.…

Updated:

Potter v. Pierce, CA NO. 31,595. Court of Appeals of New Mexico Affirms Summary Judgment for Attorney in Legal Malpractice Action on the Basis of Issue Preclusion

Under Massachusetts law, issues that have already been decided in a court of competent jurisdiction cannot be re-litigated in a subsequent action considering the same issue. Jarosz v. Palmer, 436 Mass. 526, 530 n.3 (2002). This holds true in most jurisdictions, including New Mexico, as summarized below. A New Mexico…

Updated:

Johnson v. Bronson, NO. 20120239. 2013 ND 78: Supreme Court of North Dakota Affirms Lower Court’s Decision Granting an Attorney’s Motion for Summary Judgment in Legal Malpractice Case

The attorney, provides the following case summary: The Supreme Court of North Dakota has affirmed a trial court’s decision granting an attorney’s motion for summary judgment in a legal malpractice suit. In Johnson v. Bronson, a woman hired an attorney to represent her at a hearing to determine if she…

Updated:

Angeles v. Aronsky, CA No. 8925, 1000091/09: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York Affirms Denial of Attorney’s Motion for Summary Judgment in a Legal Malpractice Case

The attorney, provides the following summary of a recent legal malpractice lawsuit: A New York appellate court has affirmed a trial court’s decision denying a lawyer’s motion for summary judgment in a legal malpractice case. In Angeles v. Aronsky, a man was attacked in the entryway to his apartment building.…

Updated:

Ruotolo v. Mussman & Northey, C.A. No. 9852, 109449/08: New York Appellate Court Affirms Judgment for Attorney in Legal Malpractice Case

The attorney, provides this analysis of a legal malpractice action against a New York lawyer: A New York appellate court has affirmed a trial court’s decision granting summary judgment for an attorney in a legal malpractice action because the client could not prove that the attorney’s conduct caused him harm.…

Updated:

Lee v. Stearn, No. B244790: Court of Appeals of California Affirms Judgment for Attorney in Legal Malpractice Action for Failure to Present Expert Testimony

The attorney, provides the following summation of a recent legal malpractice lawsuit: A California appellate court has affirmed a trial court’s decision in a legal malpractice action holding that an attorney was entitled to judgment because the client failed to present expert testimony demonstrating the attorney’s negligence. In Massachusetts, the…

Updated:

Lefta Associates v. Hurley, No. 1:09 -CV- 2487: U.S. District Court Affirms Judge’s Magistrates Recommendation to Deny Summary Judgment for Attorney in Legal Malpractice Case.

The attorney, provides the following explanation of a recent legal malpractice case: The United States District Court for the Middle District Pennsylvania has affirmed a recommendation from a magistrate judge denying a motion for summary judgment in a legal malpractice suit. In Lefta Associates v. Hurley, a client hired an…

Updated:

Williams v. CDY Development Corporation, CA Nos. 48-359, 48-360: Appeals Court of Louisiana Affirms Decision to Grant Peremptory Exclusion

The attorney, provides the following synopsis of a legal malpractice action: The Appeals Court of Louisiana has affirmed a lower court’s decision dismissing a legal malpractice action on the basis that it was time barred. In Williams v. CDY Development Corp, a tenant hired an attorney to renegotiate a commercial…